Model Comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs Llama 4 ScoutWhich is better in 2026?

Llama 4 Scout significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 4B is 5.4x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Gemma 3 4B vs Llama 4 Scout — which is better?

Gemma 3 4B (by Google) and Llama 4 Scout (by Meta) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 3 4B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MATH), while Llama 4 Scout is better at 6 benchmarks (ChartQA, DocVQA, GPQA, LiveCodeBench, MBPP, MMLU-Pro). Llama 4 Scout significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Gemma 3 4B is roughly 5.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Llama 4 Scout also accepts a larger context window (10,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Gemma 3 4B if…

  • cost matters — it's about 5.4x cheaper per token

Choose Llama 4 Scout if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 6 of 7 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 10,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

Gemma 3 4B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MATH), while Llama 4 Scout is better at 6 benchmarks (ChartQA, DocVQA, GPQA, LiveCodeBench, MBPP, MMLU-Pro).

Llama 4 Scout significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 3 4B costs less

For input processing, Gemma 3 4B ($0.02/1M tokens) is 4.0x cheaper than Llama 4 Scout ($0.08/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemma 3 4B ($0.04/1M tokens) is 7.5x cheaper than Llama 4 Scout ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Llama 4 Scout is more expensive than Gemma 3 4B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input tokens$0.02
Output tokens$0.04
Best providerDeepinfra
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input tokens$0.08
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

105.0B diff

Llama 4 Scout has 105.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 4B, making it 2625.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 4B
4.0Bparameters
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
109.0Bparameters
4.0B
Gemma 3 4B
109.0B
Llama 4 Scout

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Llama 4 Scout accepts 10,000,000 input tokens compared to Gemma 3 4B's 131,072 tokens. Llama 4 Scout can generate longer responses up to 10,000,000 tokens, while Gemma 3 4B is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input10,000,000 tokens
Output10,000,000 tokens
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3 4B and Llama 4 Scout support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3 4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 4 Scout

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 4B is licensed under Gemma, while Llama 4 Scout uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma

Open weights

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 4B was released on 2025-03-12, while Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05.

Llama 4 Scout is 1 month newer than Gemma 3 4B.

Gemma 3 4B

Mar 12, 2025

1.2 years ago

Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

1.2 years ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3 4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Llama 4 Scout's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3 4B's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Llama 4 Scout's cutoff date.

Gemma 3 4B

Aug 2024

Llama 4 Scout

—

Provider Availability

Gemma 3 4B is available from DeepInfra. Llama 4 Scout is available from DeepInfra, Lambda, Novita, Groq, Fireworks, Together.

Gemma 3 4B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.02/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.04/1M

Llama 4 Scout

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
lambda logo
Lambda
Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.11/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.34/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.59/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher MATH score (75.6% vs 50.3%)
Meta
Larger context window (10,000,000 tokens)
Higher ChartQA score (88.8% vs 68.8%)
Higher DocVQA score (94.4% vs 75.8%)
Higher GPQA score (57.2% vs 30.8%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (32.8% vs 12.6%)
Higher MBPP score (67.8% vs 63.2%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (74.3% vs 43.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3 4B
Meta
Llama 4 Scout

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 4B vs Llama 4 Scout.

Which is better, Gemma 3 4B or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 4B is made by Google and Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3 4B compare to Llama 4 Scout in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 4B scores IFEval: 90.2%, GSM8k: 89.2%, DocVQA: 75.8%, MATH: 75.6%, AI2D: 74.8%. Llama 4 Scout scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 90.6%, ChartQA: 88.8%, MMLU: 79.6%, MMLU-Pro: 74.3%.

Is Gemma 3 4B cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?

Gemma 3 4B is 4.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemma 3 4B costs $0.02/M input and $0.04/M output via deepinfra. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.08/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 4B and Llama 4 Scout?

Gemma 3 4B supports 131K tokens and Llama 4 Scout supports 10.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 4B and Llama 4 Scout?

Key differences include context window (131K vs 10.0M), input pricing ($0.02 vs $0.08/M), licensing (Gemma vs Llama 4 Community License Agreement). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 4B and Llama 4 Scout?

Gemma 3 4B is developed by Google and Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons