Model Comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen3 235B A22B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 4B is 4.0x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Gemma 3 4B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MATH), while Qwen3 235B A22B is better at 5 benchmarks (GPQA, GSM8k, LiveCodeBench, MBPP, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen3 235B A22B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 3 4B costs less

For input processing, Gemma 3 4B ($0.02/1M tokens) is 5.0x cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemma 3 4B ($0.04/1M tokens) is 2.5x cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B ($0.10/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 235B A22B is more expensive than Gemma 3 4B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input tokens$0.02
Output tokens$0.04
Best providerDeepinfra
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.10
Best providerFireworks
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

231.0B diff

Qwen3 235B A22B has 231.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 4B, making it 5775.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 4B
4.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B
235.0Bparameters
4.0B
Gemma 3 4B
235.0B
Qwen3 235B A22B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemma 3 4B accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Qwen3 235B A22B's 128,000 tokens. Gemma 3 4B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Qwen3 235B A22B is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 235B A22B does not.

Gemma 3 4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3 4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 235B A22B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 4B is licensed under Gemma, while Qwen3 235B A22B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma

Open weights

Qwen3 235B A22B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 4B was released on 2025-03-12, while Qwen3 235B A22B was released on 2025-04-29.

Qwen3 235B A22B is 2 months newer than Gemma 3 4B.

Gemma 3 4B

Mar 12, 2025

1.1 years ago

Qwen3 235B A22B

Apr 29, 2025

11 months ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3 4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Qwen3 235B A22B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3 4B's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 235B A22B's cutoff date.

Gemma 3 4B

Aug 2024

Qwen3 235B A22B

Provider Availability

Gemma 3 4B is available from DeepInfra. Qwen3 235B A22B is available from Fireworks, DeepInfra, Novita, Together.

Gemma 3 4B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.02/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.04/1M

Qwen3 235B A22B

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.10/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher MATH score (75.6% vs 71.8%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 235B A22B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher GPQA score (47.5% vs 30.8%)
Higher GSM8k score (94.4% vs 89.2%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (70.7% vs 12.6%)
Higher MBPP score (81.4% vs 63.2%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (68.2% vs 43.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3 4B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen3 235B A22B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 4B is made by Google and Qwen3 235B A22B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemma 3 4B scores IFEval: 90.2%, GSM8k: 89.2%, DocVQA: 75.8%, MATH: 75.6%, AI2D: 74.8%. Qwen3 235B A22B scores Arena Hard: 95.6%, GSM8k: 94.4%, BBH: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.8%, MMLU-Redux: 87.4%.
Gemma 3 4B is 5.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemma 3 4B costs $0.02/M input and $0.04/M output via deepinfra. Qwen3 235B A22B costs $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output via fireworks.
Gemma 3 4B supports 131K tokens and Qwen3 235B A22B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (131K vs 128K), input pricing ($0.02 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemma 3 4B is developed by Google and Qwen3 235B A22B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.