Model Comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 4B is 6.0x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Gemma 3 4B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 30B A3B is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench).

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 3 4B costs less

For input processing, Gemma 3 4B ($0.02/1M tokens) is 5.0x cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemma 3 4B ($0.04/1M tokens) is 7.5x cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 30B A3B is more expensive than Gemma 3 4B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input tokens$0.02
Output tokens$0.04
Best providerDeepinfra
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

26.5B diff

Qwen3 30B A3B has 26.5B more parameters than Gemma 3 4B, making it 662.5% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 4B
4.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
30.5Bparameters
4.0B
Gemma 3 4B
30.5B
Qwen3 30B A3B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemma 3 4B accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Qwen3 30B A3B's 128,000 tokens. Gemma 3 4B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Qwen3 30B A3B is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 30B A3B does not.

Gemma 3 4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3 4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 30B A3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 4B is licensed under Gemma, while Qwen3 30B A3B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma

Open weights

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 4B was released on 2025-03-12, while Qwen3 30B A3B was released on 2025-04-29.

Qwen3 30B A3B is 2 months newer than Gemma 3 4B.

Gemma 3 4B

Mar 12, 2025

1.1 years ago

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apr 29, 2025

1.0 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3 4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Qwen3 30B A3B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3 4B's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 30B A3B's cutoff date.

Gemma 3 4B

Aug 2024

Qwen3 30B A3B

Provider Availability

Gemma 3 4B is available from DeepInfra. Qwen3 30B A3B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Fireworks.

Gemma 3 4B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.02/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.04/1M

Qwen3 30B A3B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.44/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 30B A3B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher GPQA score (65.8% vs 30.8%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (62.6% vs 12.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3 4B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 4B is made by Google and Qwen3 30B A3B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemma 3 4B scores IFEval: 90.2%, GSM8k: 89.2%, DocVQA: 75.8%, MATH: 75.6%, AI2D: 74.8%. Qwen3 30B A3B scores Arena Hard: 91.0%, AIME 2024: 80.4%, LiveBench: 74.3%, Multi-IF: 72.2%, AIME 2025: 70.9%.
Gemma 3 4B is 5.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemma 3 4B costs $0.02/M input and $0.04/M output via deepinfra. Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra.
Gemma 3 4B supports 131K tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (131K vs 128K), input pricing ($0.02 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemma 3 4B is developed by Google and Qwen3 30B A3B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.