Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MMLU-Pro).

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Apr 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Apr 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Input tokens$0.07
Output tokens$0.14
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

22.1B diff

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct has 22.1B more parameters than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview), making it 1156.5% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
1.9Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
24.0Bparameters
1.9B
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
24.0B
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct specifies input context (32,000 tokens). Only Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct specifies output context (32,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Sun Apr 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct does not.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is licensed under Gemma, while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Gemma

Open weights

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) was released on 2025-05-20, while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct was released on 2025-01-30.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is 4 months newer than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

May 20, 2025

11 months ago

3mo newer
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Jan 30, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct has a cutoff of 2023-10-01.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) has more recent training data (up to 2024-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct (2023-10-01).

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Jun 2024

8 mo newer
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Oct 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (32,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (45.3% vs 24.8%)
Higher HumanEval score (84.8% vs 66.5%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (66.3% vs 40.5%)

Detailed Comparison

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is made by Google and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct scores Arena Hard: 87.6%, HumanEval: 84.8%, MT-Bench: 83.5%, IFEval: 82.9%, MATH: 70.6%.
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports an unknown number of tokens and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct supports 32K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is developed by Google and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is developed by Mistral AI.