The AI arena is free today

Open Playground

Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs o1-miniWhich is better in 2026?

o1-mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs o1-mini — which is better?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) (by Google) and o1-mini (by OpenAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while o1-mini is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MMLU). o1-mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose o1-mini if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while o1-mini is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MMLU).

o1-mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Aug 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o1-mini specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only o1-mini specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
o1-mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Fri Aug 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports multimodal inputs, whereas o1-mini does not.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o1-mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is licensed under Gemma, while o1-mini uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Gemma

Open weights

o1-mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) was released on 2025-05-20, while o1-mini was released on 2024-09-12.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is 8 months newer than o1-mini.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

May 20, 2025

1.2 years ago

8mo newer
o1-mini

Sep 12, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while o1-mini's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)'s training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without o1-mini's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Jun 2024

o1-mini

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Supports multimodal inputs
Has open weights
OpenAI
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (60.0% vs 24.8%)
Higher HumanEval score (92.4% vs 66.5%)
Higher MMLU score (85.2% vs 60.1%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and o1-mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
✓ Preferred
o1-mini
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
OpenAI
o1-mini

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs o1-mini.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) or o1-mini?

o1-mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is made by Google and o1-mini is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) compare to o1-mini in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. o1-mini scores HumanEval: 92.4%, MATH-500: 90.0%, MMLU: 85.2%, SuperGLUE: 75.0%, GPQA: 60.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and o1-mini?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports an unknown number of tokens and o1-mini supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and o1-mini?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and o1-mini?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is developed by Google and o1-mini is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons