Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Grok-4

Grok-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Grok-4 is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, LiveCodeBench).

Grok-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
xAI
Grok-4
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerxAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok-4 specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only Grok-4 specifies output context (8,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
xAI
Grok-4
Input256,000 tokens
Output8,000 tokens
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and Grok-4 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok-4

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26, while Grok-4 was released on 2025-07-09.

Grok-4 is 0 month newer than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

9 months ago

Grok-4

Jul 9, 2025

9 months ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Grok-4 has a cutoff of 2024-12-31.

Grok-4 has more recent training data (up to 2024-12-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E2B Instructed (2024-06-01).

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 2024

Grok-4

Dec 2024

6 mo newer

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
xAI
Larger context window (256,000 tokens)
Higher AIME 2025 score (91.7% vs 6.7%)
Higher GPQA score (87.5% vs 24.8%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (79.0% vs 13.2%)
GoogleGemma 3n E2B Instructed
xAIGrok-4
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
xAI
Grok-4

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Grok-4

Grok-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is made by Google and Grok-4 is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed scores HumanEval: 66.5%, MMLU: 60.1%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 59.0%, MBPP: 56.6%, Global-MMLU: 55.1%. Grok-4 scores AIME 2025: 91.7%, HMMT25: 90.0%, GPQA: 87.5%, LiveCodeBench: 79.0%, Humanity's Last Exam: 40.0%.
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports an unknown number of tokens and Grok-4 supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is developed by Google and Grok-4 is developed by xAI.