Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, MBPP).

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat May 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

0.0M diff

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 has 0.0B more parameters than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed, making it 0.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
8.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
8.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
8.0B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 does not.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 uses Llama 3.1 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 was released on 2025-03-18.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is 3 months newer than Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

11 months ago

3mo newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Mar 18, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 has a cutoff of 2023-12-31.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has more recent training data (up to 2024-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 (2023-12-31).

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 2024

6 mo newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Dec 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Supports multimodal inputs
Has open weights
Higher AIME 2025 score (47.1% vs 6.7%)
Higher GPQA score (54.1% vs 24.8%)
Higher MBPP score (84.6% vs 56.6%)

Detailed Comparison

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed or Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is made by Google and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B Instructed compare to Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed scores HumanEval: 66.5%, MMLU: 60.1%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 59.0%, MBPP: 56.6%, Global-MMLU: 55.1%. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 scores MATH-500: 95.4%, MBPP: 84.6%, MT-Bench: 81.0%, IFEval: 79.3%, BFCL v2: 63.6%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 3.1 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is developed by Google and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is developed by NVIDIA.