Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Llama 4 Scout is better at 6 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench, MBPP, MGSM, MMLU, MMLU-Pro).

Llama 4 Scout significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input tokens$0.08
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

101.0B diff

Llama 4 Scout has 101.0B more parameters than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed, making it 1262.5% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
8.0Bparameters
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
109.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
109.0B
Llama 4 Scout

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 4 Scout specifies input context (10,000,000 tokens). Only Llama 4 Scout specifies output context (10,000,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input10,000,000 tokens
Output10,000,000 tokens
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and Llama 4 Scout support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 4 Scout

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 4 Scout uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26, while Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is 3 months newer than Llama 4 Scout.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

9 months ago

2mo newer
Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

1.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Llama 4 Scout's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Llama 4 Scout's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 2024

Llama 4 Scout

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Meta
Larger context window (10,000,000 tokens)
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (57.2% vs 24.8%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (32.8% vs 13.2%)
Higher MBPP score (67.8% vs 56.6%)
Higher MGSM score (90.6% vs 53.1%)
Higher MMLU score (79.6% vs 60.1%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (74.3% vs 40.5%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Meta
Llama 4 Scout

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is made by Google and Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed scores HumanEval: 66.5%, MMLU: 60.1%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 59.0%, MBPP: 56.6%, Global-MMLU: 55.1%. Llama 4 Scout scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 90.6%, ChartQA: 88.8%, MMLU: 79.6%, MMLU-Pro: 74.3%.
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports an unknown number of tokens and Llama 4 Scout supports 10.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 4 Community License Agreement). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is developed by Google and Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta.