Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs o1-preview

o1-preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while o1-preview is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MGSM, MMLU).

o1-preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o1-preview specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only o1-preview specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
o1-preview
Input128,000 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs, whereas o1-preview does not.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o1-preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

o1-preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26, while o1-preview was released on 2024-09-12.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is 10 months newer than o1-preview.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

10 months ago

9mo newer
o1-preview

Sep 12, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while o1-preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without o1-preview's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 2024

o1-preview

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Supports multimodal inputs
OpenAI
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (73.3% vs 24.8%)
Higher MGSM score (90.8% vs 53.1%)
Higher MMLU score (90.8% vs 60.1%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
OpenAI
o1-preview

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs o1-preview.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed or o1-preview?

o1-preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is made by Google and o1-preview is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B Instructed compare to o1-preview in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed scores HumanEval: 66.5%, MMLU: 60.1%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 59.0%, MBPP: 56.6%, Global-MMLU: 55.1%. o1-preview scores MGSM: 90.8%, MMLU: 90.8%, MATH: 85.5%, GPQA: 73.3%, LiveBench: 52.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and o1-preview?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports an unknown number of tokens and o1-preview supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and o1-preview?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and o1-preview?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is developed by Google and o1-preview is developed by OpenAI.