Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs o1-pro

o1-pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while o1-pro is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

o1-pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
OpenAI
o1-pro
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and o1-pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o1-pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

o1-pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26, while o1-pro was released on 2024-12-17.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is 6 months newer than o1-pro.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

10 months ago

6mo newer
o1-pro

Dec 17, 2024

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while o1-pro has a cutoff of 2023-09-30.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has more recent training data (up to 2024-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to o1-pro (2023-09-30).

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 2024

9 mo newer
o1-pro

Sep 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher GPQA score (79.0% vs 24.8%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
OpenAI
o1-pro

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs o1-pro

o1-pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is made by Google and o1-pro is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed scores HumanEval: 66.5%, MMLU: 60.1%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 59.0%, MBPP: 56.6%, Global-MMLU: 55.1%. o1-pro scores AIME 2024: 86.0%, GPQA: 79.0%.
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is developed by Google and o1-pro is developed by OpenAI.