Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MBPP, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun May 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1.0B diff

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has 1.0B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Omni-7B, making it 14.3% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
8.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
7.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
7.0B
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B was released on 2025-03-27.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is 3 months newer than Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

10 months ago

3mo newer
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Mar 27, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5-Omni-7B's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 2024

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (30.8% vs 24.8%)
Higher HumanEval score (78.7% vs 66.5%)
Higher MBPP score (73.2% vs 56.6%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (47.0% vs 40.5%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed or Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is made by Google and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B Instructed compare to Qwen2.5-Omni-7B in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed scores HumanEval: 66.5%, MMLU: 60.1%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 59.0%, MBPP: 56.6%, Global-MMLU: 55.1%. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B scores DocVQA: 95.2%, VocalSound: 93.9%, GSM8k: 88.7%, GiantSteps Tempo: 88.0%, ChartQA: 85.3%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is developed by Google and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.