Gemma 3n E2B vs Hermes 3 70B Comparison
Comparing Gemma 3n E2B and Hermes 3 70B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemma 3n E2B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Hermes 3 70B is better at 6 benchmarks (ARC-C, ARC-E, BoolQ, HellaSwag, PIQA, Winogrande).
Hermes 3 70B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Hermes 3 70B has 62.0B more parameters than Gemma 3n E2B, making it 775.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Hermes 3 70B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Hermes 3 70B specifies output context (16,384 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Gemma 3n E2B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hermes 3 70B does not.
Gemma 3n E2B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Gemma 3n E2B
Hermes 3 70B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemma 3n E2B is licensed under a proprietary license, while Hermes 3 70B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemma 3n E2B was released on 2025-06-26, while Hermes 3 70B was released on 2024-08-15.
Gemma 3n E2B is 11 months newer than Hermes 3 70B.
Jun 26, 2025
8 months ago
10mo newerAug 15, 2024
1.6 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemma 3n E2B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Hermes 3 70B's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Hermes 3 70B's cutoff date.
Jun 2024
—
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Gemma 3n E2B
View detailsHermes 3 70B
View detailsNous Research
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|