Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E2B vs Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Comparing Gemma 3n E2B and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3n E2B and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2.6B diff

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct has 2.6B more parameters than Gemma 3n E2B, making it 32.5% larger.

Gemma 3n E2B

8.0Bparameters

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

10.6Bparameters

8.0B

Gemma 3n E2B

10.6B

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 3.2 11B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Llama 3.2 11B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Gemma 3n E2B

Input- tokens

Output- tokens

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Input128,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Fri May 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E2B and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E2B

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 3.2 11B Instruct uses Llama 3.2 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Llama 3.2 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B was released on 2025-06-26, while Llama 3.2 11B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25.

Gemma 3n E2B is 9 months newer than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct.

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 26, 2025

10 months ago

9mo newer

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Sep 25, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Llama 3.2 11B Instruct has a cutoff of 2023-12-31.

Gemma 3n E2B has more recent training data (up to 2024-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Llama 3.2 11B Instruct (2023-12-31).

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 2024

6 mo newer

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Dec 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Gemma 3n E2B

View details

Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Gemma 3n E2B	Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B vs Llama 3.2 11B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B or Llama 3.2 11B Instruct?

Gemma 3n E2B (Google) and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct (Meta) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemma 3n E2B compare to Llama 3.2 11B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct scores AI2D: 91.1%, DocVQA: 88.4%, ChartQA: 83.4%, VQAv2 (test): 75.2%, MMLU: 73.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E2B and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct?

Gemma 3n E2B supports an unknown number of tokens and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 3.2 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct?

Gemma 3n E2B is developed by Google and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is developed by Meta.