Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E2B vs MedGemma 4B IT

Comparing Gemma 3n E2B and MedGemma 4B IT across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3n E2B and MedGemma 4B IT don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

3.7B diff

Gemma 3n E2B has 3.7B more parameters than MedGemma 4B IT, making it 86.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E2B
8.0Bparameters
Google
MedGemma 4B IT
4.3Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E2B
4.3B
MedGemma 4B IT

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E2B and MedGemma 4B IT support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MedGemma 4B IT

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B is licensed under a proprietary license, while MedGemma 4B IT uses Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B

Proprietary

Closed source

MedGemma 4B IT

Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B was released on 2025-06-26, while MedGemma 4B IT was released on 2025-05-20.

Gemma 3n E2B is 1 month newer than MedGemma 4B IT.

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 26, 2025

11 months ago

1mo newer
MedGemma 4B IT

May 20, 2025

1.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while MedGemma 4B IT's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MedGemma 4B IT's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 2024

MedGemma 4B IT

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Google
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E2B
Google
MedGemma 4B IT

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B vs MedGemma 4B IT.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B or MedGemma 4B IT?

Gemma 3n E2B (Google) and MedGemma 4B IT (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemma 3n E2B compare to MedGemma 4B IT in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. MedGemma 4B IT scores MIMIC CXR: 88.9%, DermMCQA: 71.8%, PathMCQA: 69.8%, SlakeVQA: 62.3%, VQA-Rad: 49.9%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B and MedGemma 4B IT?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.