Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E2B vs Muse Spark 1.1Which is better in 2026?

Comparing Gemma 3n E2B and Muse Spark 1.1 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Gemma 3n E2B vs Muse Spark 1.1 — which is better?

Gemma 3n E2B (by Google) and Muse Spark 1.1 (by Meta) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E2B if…

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose Muse Spark 1.1 if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3n E2B and Muse Spark 1.1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Spark 1.1 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Muse Spark 1.1 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E2B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E2B and Muse Spark 1.1 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemma 3n E2B

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B was released on 2025-06-26, while Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09.

Muse Spark 1.1 is 13 months newer than Gemma 3n E2B.

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 26, 2025

1.1 years ago

Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

2 weeks ago

1.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Muse Spark 1.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Spark 1.1's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 2024

Muse Spark 1.1

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Meta
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E2B and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E2B
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.1
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E2B
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B vs Muse Spark 1.1.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B or Muse Spark 1.1?

Gemma 3n E2B (Google) and Muse Spark 1.1 (Meta) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemma 3n E2B compare to Muse Spark 1.1 in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E2B and Muse Spark 1.1?

Gemma 3n E2B supports an unknown number of tokens and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B and Muse Spark 1.1?

Gemma 3n E2B is developed by Google and Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons