Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E2B vs Phi 4 Mini

Phi 4 Mini shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E2B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (HellaSwag, PIQA), while Phi 4 Mini is better at 5 benchmarks (ARC-C, BIG-Bench Hard, BoolQ, Social IQa, Winogrande).

Phi 4 Mini shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue May 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

4.2B diff

Gemma 3n E2B has 4.2B more parameters than Phi 4 Mini, making it 108.3% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E2B
8.0Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini
3.8Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E2B
3.8B
Phi 4 Mini

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E2B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Mini does not.

Gemma 3n E2B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi 4 Mini uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B

Proprietary

Closed source

Phi 4 Mini

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B was released on 2025-06-26, while Phi 4 Mini was released on 2025-02-01.

Gemma 3n E2B is 5 months newer than Phi 4 Mini.

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 26, 2025

10 months ago

4mo newer
Phi 4 Mini

Feb 1, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Both models have the same knowledge cutoff date of 2024-06-01.

They should have similar awareness of historical events and information up to this date.

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 2024

Phi 4 Mini

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher HellaSwag score (72.2% vs 69.1%)
Higher PIQA score (78.9% vs 77.6%)
Microsoft
Has open weights
Higher ARC-C score (83.7% vs 51.7%)
Higher BIG-Bench Hard score (70.4% vs 44.3%)
Higher BoolQ score (81.2% vs 76.4%)
Higher Social IQa score (72.5% vs 48.8%)
Higher Winogrande score (67.0% vs 66.8%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E2B
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B vs Phi 4 Mini.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B or Phi 4 Mini?

Phi 4 Mini shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemma 3n E2B is made by Google and Phi 4 Mini is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B compare to Phi 4 Mini in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. Phi 4 Mini scores GSM8k: 88.6%, ARC-C: 83.7%, BoolQ: 81.2%, OpenBookQA: 79.2%, PIQA: 77.6%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B and Phi 4 Mini?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B and Phi 4 Mini?

Gemma 3n E2B is developed by Google and Phi 4 Mini is developed by Microsoft.