The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E2B vs Phi 4 Mini

Phi 4 Mini leads the LLM Stats Score -4.0 to -10.1.

Google · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Phi 4 Mini leads the overall LLM Stats Score -4.0 to -10.1, ranking #345 overall.

In the 7 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Phi 4 Mini wins 5; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E2B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025

Choose Phi 4 Mini

  • overall performance matters — it scores -4.0 and ranks #345 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 5 of 7 exact shared results
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-10.1
#364
-4.0
#345
-10.3
#357
-4.1
#338
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 7
5 of 7
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 3n E2B
Phi 4 Mini
-6.3#319
2.3#292
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Gemma 3n E2B · 17 for Phi 4 Mini

7 shared

Gemma 3n E2B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (HellaSwag, PIQA), while Phi 4 Mini is better at 5 benchmarks (ARC-C, BIG-Bench Hard, BoolQ, Social IQa, Winogrande).

Phi 4 Mini shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

4.2B diff

Gemma 3n E2B has 4.2B more parameters than Phi 4 Mini, making it 108.3% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E2B
8.0Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini
3.8Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E2B
3.8B
Phi 4 Mini

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3n E2B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Mini does not.

Gemma 3n E2B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi 4 Mini uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B

Proprietary

Closed source

Phi 4 Mini

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B was released on 2025-06-26, while Phi 4 Mini was released on 2025-02-01.

Gemma 3n E2B is 5 months newer than Phi 4 Mini.

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

4mo newer
Phi 4 Mini

Feb 1, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Both models have the same knowledge cutoff date of 2024-06-01.

They should have similar awareness of historical events and information up to this date.

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 2024

Phi 4 Mini

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E2B and Phi 4 Mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E2B
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Mini
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B vs Phi 4 Mini.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B or Phi 4 Mini?

Phi 4 Mini leads the LLM Stats Score -4.0 to -10.1. Gemma 3n E2B is made by Google and Phi 4 Mini is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B compare to Phi 4 Mini in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. Phi 4 Mini scores GSM8k: 88.6%, ARC-C: 83.7%, BoolQ: 81.2%, OpenBookQA: 79.2%, PIQA: 77.6%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B and Phi 4 Mini?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-10.1 vs -4.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B and Phi 4 Mini?

Gemma 3n E2B is developed by Google and Phi 4 Mini is developed by Microsoft.