Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs GPT-4.1

GPT-4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GPT-4.1 is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, MMLU).

GPT-4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-4.1 specifies input context (1,047,576 tokens). Only GPT-4.1 specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4.1
Input1,047,576 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and GPT-4.1 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is licensed under Gemma, while GPT-4.1 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

GPT-4.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20, while GPT-4.1 was released on 2025-04-14.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is 1 month newer than GPT-4.1.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

1.0 years ago

1mo newer
GPT-4.1

Apr 14, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Both models have the same knowledge cutoff date of 2024-06-01.

They should have similar awareness of historical events and information up to this date.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

GPT-4.1

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Has open weights
OpenAI
Larger context window (1,047,576 tokens)
Higher AIME 2025 score (46.4% vs 11.6%)
Higher GPQA score (66.3% vs 23.7%)
Higher MMLU score (90.2% vs 64.9%)
GoogleGemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
OpenAIGPT-4.1
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
OpenAI
GPT-4.1

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs GPT-4.1.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview or GPT-4.1?

GPT-4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google and GPT-4.1 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview compare to GPT-4.1 in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%. GPT-4.1 scores MMLU: 90.2%, CharXiv-D: 87.9%, IFEval: 87.4%, MMMLU: 87.3%, MMMU: 74.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and GPT-4.1?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and GPT-4.1 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and GPT-4.1?

Key differences include licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and GPT-4.1?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google and GPT-4.1 is developed by OpenAI.