Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Kimi K2 InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Kimi K2 Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Kimi K2 Instruct — which is better?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview (by Google) and Kimi K2 Instruct (by Moonshot AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Kimi K2 Instruct is better at 5 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, HumanEval, MMLU, MMLU-Pro). Kimi K2 Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview if…

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose Kimi K2 Instruct if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 5 of 5 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Kimi K2 Instruct is better at 5 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, HumanEval, MMLU, MMLU-Pro).

Kimi K2 Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

998.1B diff

Kimi K2 Instruct has 998.1B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview, making it 52256.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
1.9Bparameters
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct
1.0Tparameters
1.9B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
1000.0B
Kimi K2 Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Kimi K2 Instruct specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Kimi K2 Instruct specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports multimodal inputs, whereas Kimi K2 Instruct does not.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi K2 Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is licensed under Gemma, while Kimi K2 Instruct uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

Kimi K2 Instruct

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20, while Kimi K2 Instruct was released on 2025-07-11.

Kimi K2 Instruct is 2 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

1.2 years ago

Kimi K2 Instruct

Jul 11, 2025

1.0 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Kimi K2 Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Kimi K2 Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

Kimi K2 Instruct

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Supports multimodal inputs
Moonshot AI
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher AIME 2025 score (49.5% vs 11.6%)
Higher GPQA score (75.1% vs 23.7%)
Higher HumanEval score (93.3% vs 75.0%)
Higher MMLU score (89.5% vs 64.9%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (81.1% vs 50.6%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Kimi K2 Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
✓ Preferred
Kimi K2 Instruct
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Kimi K2 Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview or Kimi K2 Instruct?

Kimi K2 Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google and Kimi K2 Instruct is made by Moonshot AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview compare to Kimi K2 Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%. Kimi K2 Instruct scores MATH-500: 97.4%, GSM8k: 97.3%, CBNSL: 95.6%, HumanEval: 93.3%, MMLU-Redux: 92.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Kimi K2 Instruct?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Kimi K2 Instruct supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Kimi K2 Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Kimi K2 Instruct?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google and Kimi K2 Instruct is developed by Moonshot AI.

Related comparisons