Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MGSM, MMLU).

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun May 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

8.7B diff

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct has 8.7B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview, making it 455.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
1.9Bparameters
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
10.6Bparameters
1.9B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
10.6B
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 3.2 11B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Llama 3.2 11B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sun May 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is licensed under Gemma, while Llama 3.2 11B Instruct uses Llama 3.2 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Llama 3.2 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20, while Llama 3.2 11B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is 8 months newer than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

11 months ago

7mo newer
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Sep 25, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Llama 3.2 11B Instruct has a cutoff of 2023-12-31.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has more recent training data (up to 2024-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Llama 3.2 11B Instruct (2023-12-31).

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

6 mo newer
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Dec 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Meta
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (32.8% vs 23.7%)
Higher MGSM score (68.9% vs 60.7%)
Higher MMLU score (73.0% vs 64.9%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Llama 3.2 11B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview or Llama 3.2 11B Instruct?

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview compare to Llama 3.2 11B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct scores AI2D: 91.1%, DocVQA: 88.4%, ChartQA: 83.4%, VQAv2 (test): 75.2%, MMLU: 73.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct?

Key differences include licensing (Gemma vs Llama 3.2 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is developed by Meta.