The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs MiniMax M1 40K

MiniMax M1 40K significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Google · MiniMax · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while MiniMax M1 40K is better at 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, LiveCodeBench, MMLU-Pro). MiniMax M1 40K significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose MiniMax M1 40K

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Google
MiniMax M1 40K
MiniMax
Benchmark wins
0 of 4
4 of 4
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—
Released
May 2025
Jun 2025
License
Gemma
MIT

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while MiniMax M1 40K is better at 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, LiveCodeBench, MMLU-Pro).

MiniMax M1 40K significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

454.1B diff

MiniMax M1 40K has 454.1B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview, making it 23774.3% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
1.9Bparameters
MiniMax
MiniMax M1 40K
456.0Bparameters
1.9B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
456.0B
MiniMax M1 40K

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiniMax M1 40K does not.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniMax M1 40K

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is licensed under Gemma, while MiniMax M1 40K uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

MiniMax M1 40K

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20, while MiniMax M1 40K was released on 2025-06-16.

MiniMax M1 40K is 1 month newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

MiniMax M1 40K

Jun 16, 2025

1.2 years ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while MiniMax M1 40K's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiniMax M1 40K's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

MiniMax M1 40K

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and MiniMax M1 40K side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
✓ Preferred
MiniMax M1 40K
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs MiniMax M1 40K.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview or MiniMax M1 40K?

MiniMax M1 40K significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google and MiniMax M1 40K is made by MiniMax. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview compare to MiniMax M1 40K in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%. MiniMax M1 40K scores MATH-500: 96.0%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, MMLU-Pro: 80.6%, ZebraLogic: 80.1%, OpenAI-MRCR: 2 needle 128k: 76.1%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and MiniMax M1 40K?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and MiniMax M1 40K?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google and MiniMax M1 40K is developed by MiniMax.

Related comparisons