Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is better at 6 benchmarks (ARC-C, GPQA, HumanEval, MBPP, MMLU, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

12.8B diff

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 12.8B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview, making it 669.6% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
1.9Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
14.7Bparameters
1.9B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
14.7B
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is licensed under Gemma, while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20, while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is 8 months newer than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

11 months ago

8mo newer
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 14B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Supports multimodal inputs
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher ARC-C score (67.3% vs 61.6%)
Higher GPQA score (45.5% vs 23.7%)
Higher HumanEval score (83.5% vs 75.0%)
Higher MBPP score (82.0% vs 63.6%)
Higher MMLU score (79.7% vs 64.9%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (63.7% vs 50.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%. Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores GSM8k: 94.8%, HumanEval: 83.5%, MBPP: 82.0%, MATH: 80.0%, MMLU-Redux: 80.0%.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.