The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Seed 2.0 Pro

Seed 2.0 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 39.5 to -5.2.

Google · ByteDance · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Seed 2.0 Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 39.5 to -5.2, ranking #56 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Seed 2.0 Pro wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Seed 2.0 Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 39.5 and ranks #56 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Google
Seed 2.0 Pro
ByteDance
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-5.2
#355
39.5
#56
Reasoning
-5.9
#350
39.0
#56
Coding
-0.1
#240
22.0
#83
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.50 / M
Output price
— / M
$3.00 / M
Context window
—
256,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Seed 2.0 Pro
Math
-1.3#302
32.2#62
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

28 reported for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview · 6 for Seed 2.0 Pro

2 shared

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Seed 2.0 Pro is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA).

Seed 2.0 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Seed 2.0 Pro specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only Seed 2.0 Pro specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
ByteDance
Seed 2.0 Pro
Input256,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Seed 2.0 Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Seed 2.0 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is licensed under Gemma, while Seed 2.0 Pro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

Seed 2.0 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20, while Seed 2.0 Pro was released on 2026-02-14.

Seed 2.0 Pro is 9 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

Seed 2.0 Pro

Feb 14, 2026

7 months ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Seed 2.0 Pro has a cutoff of 2024-01-01.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has more recent training data (up to 2024-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Seed 2.0 Pro (2024-01-01).

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

5 mo newer
Seed 2.0 Pro

Jan 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Seed 2.0 Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
✓ Preferred
Seed 2.0 Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Seed 2.0 Pro.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview or Seed 2.0 Pro?

Seed 2.0 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 39.5 to -5.2. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google and Seed 2.0 Pro is made by ByteDance. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview compare to Seed 2.0 Pro in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%. Seed 2.0 Pro scores AIME 2025: 98.3%, AIME 2026: 94.2%, GPQA: 88.9%, LiveCodeBench v6: 87.8%, BrowseComp: 77.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Seed 2.0 Pro?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Seed 2.0 Pro supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Seed 2.0 Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-5.2 vs 39.5), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Seed 2.0 Pro?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google and Seed 2.0 Pro is developed by ByteDance.

Related comparisons