Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs GPT-5 mini

GPT-5 mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GPT-5 mini is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA).

GPT-5 mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Apr 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$40.00
Best providerTogether
OpenAI
GPT-5 mini
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3n E4B Instructed specifies input context (32,000 tokens). Only Gemma 3n E4B Instructed specifies output context (32,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-5 mini
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Apr 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and GPT-5 mini support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-5 mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-5 mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26, while GPT-5 mini was released on 2025-08-07.

GPT-5 mini is 1 month newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

9 months ago

GPT-5 mini

Aug 7, 2025

8 months ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while GPT-5 mini has a cutoff of 2024-05-30.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has more recent training data (up to 2024-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to GPT-5 mini (2024-05-30).

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

1 mo newer
GPT-5 mini

May 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (32,000 tokens)
OpenAI
Higher AIME 2025 score (91.1% vs 11.6%)
Higher GPQA score (82.3% vs 23.7%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
OpenAI
GPT-5 mini

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs GPT-5 mini

GPT-5 mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is made by Google and GPT-5 mini is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%. GPT-5 mini scores AIME 2025: 91.1%, HMMT 2025: 87.8%, GPQA: 82.3%, FrontierMath: 22.1%, Humanity's Last Exam: 16.7%.
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens and GPT-5 mini supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is developed by Google and GPT-5 mini is developed by OpenAI.