Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs MiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Flash is 166.7x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while MiMo-V2-Flash is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, MMLU-Pro).

MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2-Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($20.00/1M tokens) is 200.0x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($40.00/1M tokens) is 133.3x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$40.00
Best providerTogether
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

301.0B diff

MiMo-V2-Flash has 301.0B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed, making it 3762.5% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
8.0Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
309.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
309.0B
MiMo-V2-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2-Flash accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's 32,000 tokens. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed can generate longer responses up to 32,000 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Flash is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input256,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Flash does not.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26, while MiMo-V2-Flash was released on 2025-12-16.

MiMo-V2-Flash is 6 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

9 months ago

MiMo-V2-Flash

Dec 16, 2025

4 months ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while MiMo-V2-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2-Flash's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

MiMo-V2-Flash

—

Provider Availability

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is available from Together. MiMo-V2-Flash is available from Xiaomi.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $40.00/1M

MiMo-V2-Flash

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Supports multimodal inputs
Xiaomi
Larger context window (256,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher AIME 2025 score (94.1% vs 11.6%)
Higher GPQA score (83.7% vs 23.7%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (84.9% vs 50.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs MiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is made by Google and MiMo-V2-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%. MiMo-V2-Flash scores AIME 2025: 94.1%, Arena-Hard v2: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 84.9%, HMMT 2025: 84.4%, GPQA: 83.7%.
MiMo-V2-Flash is 200.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed costs $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output via together. MiMo-V2-Flash costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via xiaomi.
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens and MiMo-V2-Flash supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (32K vs 256K), input pricing ($20.00 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is developed by Google and MiMo-V2-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.