Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Nemotron Nano 9B v2 Comparison

Comparing Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, LiveCodeBench).

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Mar 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Mar 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$40.00
Best providerTogether
NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

900.0M diff

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 has 0.9B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed, making it 11.3% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
8.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
8.9Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
8.9B
Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3n E4B Instructed specifies input context (32,000 tokens). Only Gemma 3n E4B Instructed specifies output context (32,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Mar 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Nano 9B v2 does not.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron Nano 9B v2 uses NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement .

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26, while Nemotron Nano 9B v2 was released on 2025-08-18.

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is 2 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

8 months ago

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Aug 18, 2025

7 months ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Nemotron Nano 9B v2 has a cutoff of 2024-09-01.

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 has more recent training data (up to 2024-09-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed (2024-06-01).

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Sep 2024

3 mo newer

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (32,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Has open weights
Higher AIME 2025 score (72.1% vs 11.6%)
Higher GPQA score (64.0% vs 23.7%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (71.1% vs 13.2%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2