Model Comparison
Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Gemma 4 31BWhich is better in 2026?
Gemma 4 31B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 4 31B is 1.0x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Gemma 4 31B — which is better?
Gemma 4 26B-A4B (by Google) and Gemma 4 31B (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Gemma 4 26B-A4B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemma 4 31B is better at 12 benchmarks (AIME 2026, BIG-Bench Extra Hard, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, LiveCodeBench v6, MathVision, MedXpertQA, MMLU-Pro, MMMLU, MMMU-Pro, MRCR v2 (8-needle), t2-bench). Gemma 4 31B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Choose Gemma 4 26B-A4B if…
- you want predictable pricing at $0.13/M input and $0.40/M output
Choose Gemma 4 31B if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 12 of 12 shared benchmarks
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemma 4 26B-A4B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemma 4 31B is better at 12 benchmarks (AIME 2026, BIG-Bench Extra Hard, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, LiveCodeBench v6, MathVision, MedXpertQA, MMLU-Pro, MMMLU, MMMU-Pro, MRCR v2 (8-needle), t2-bench).
Gemma 4 31B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemma 4 26B-A4B ($0.13/1M tokens) costs the same as Gemma 4 31B ($0.13/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemma 4 26B-A4B ($0.40/1M tokens) is 1.1x more expensive than Gemma 4 31B ($0.38/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemma 4 26B-A4B is more expensive than Gemma 4 31B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Gemma 4 31B has 5.5B more parameters than Gemma 4 26B-A4B, making it 21.8% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 262,144 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 131,072 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Gemma 4 26B-A4B and Gemma 4 31B support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemma 4 26B-A4B
Gemma 4 31B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.
Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Both models were released on 2026-04-02.
They likely represent similar generations of model development.
Apr 2, 2026
3 months ago
Apr 2, 2026
3 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Both models have the same knowledge cutoff date of 2025-01-01.
They should have similar awareness of historical events and information up to this date.
Jan 2025
Jan 2025
Provider Availability
Gemma 4 26B-A4B is available from Novita. Gemma 4 31B is available from DeepInfra, FriendliAI, Novita, Together.
Gemma 4 26B-A4B
Gemma 4 31B
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.
Gemma 4 31B
View detailsDetailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemma 4 26B-A4B and Gemma 4 31B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Gemma 4 31B.