Model Comparison

Gemma 4 E2B vs Muse Spark 1.1Which is better in 2026?

Comparing Gemma 4 E2B and Muse Spark 1.1 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Gemma 4 E2B vs Muse Spark 1.1 — which is better?

Gemma 4 E2B (by Google) and Muse Spark 1.1 (by Meta) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Choose Gemma 4 E2B if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Spark 1.1 if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 4 E2B and Muse Spark 1.1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 4 E2B and Muse Spark 1.1 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 4 E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 4 E2B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Muse Spark 1.1 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 4 E2B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 4 E2B was released on 2026-04-02, while Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09.

Muse Spark 1.1 is 3 months newer than Gemma 4 E2B.

Gemma 4 E2B

Apr 2, 2026

3 months ago

Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

1 weeks ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 4 E2B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while Muse Spark 1.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 4 E2B's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Spark 1.1's cutoff date.

Gemma 4 E2B

Jan 2025

Muse Spark 1.1

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Has open weights
Meta

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 4 E2B and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 4 E2B
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.1
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 4 E2B
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 4 E2B vs Muse Spark 1.1.

Which is better, Gemma 4 E2B or Muse Spark 1.1?

Gemma 4 E2B (Google) and Muse Spark 1.1 (Meta) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemma 4 E2B compare to Muse Spark 1.1 in benchmarks?

Gemma 4 E2B scores MMMLU: 67.4%, MMLU-Pro: 60.0%, MathVision: 52.4%, MMMU-Pro: 44.2%, LiveCodeBench v6: 44.0%. Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 4 E2B and Muse Spark 1.1?

Key differences include licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 4 E2B and Muse Spark 1.1?

Gemma 4 E2B is developed by Google and Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons