The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GLM-4.5-Air vs GLM-5.3-Flash

GLM-5.3-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Zhipu AI · Zhipu AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GLM-4.5-Air outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GLM-5.3-Flash is better at 1 benchmark (Humanity's Last Exam). GLM-5.3-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GLM-4.5-Air

  • you are already invested in the Zhipu AI ecosystem

Choose GLM-5.3-Flash

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.50 / M
Context window
1,000,000
Released
Jul 2025
Aug 2026
License
MIT
MIT

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GLM-4.5-Air outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GLM-5.3-Flash is better at 1 benchmark (Humanity's Last Exam).

GLM-5.3-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

214.0B diff

GLM-5.3-Flash has 214.0B more parameters than GLM-4.5-Air, making it 201.9% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5-Air
106.0Bparameters
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3-Flash
320.0Bparameters
106.0B
GLM-4.5-Air
320.0B
GLM-5.3-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GLM-5.3-Flash specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only GLM-5.3-Flash specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5-Air
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3-Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GLM-5.3-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-4.5-Air does not.

GLM-5.3-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GLM-4.5-Air

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GLM-5.3-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

GLM-4.5-Air

MIT

Open weights

GLM-5.3-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-4.5-Air was released on 2025-07-28, while GLM-5.3-Flash was released on 2026-08-26.

GLM-5.3-Flash is 13 months newer than GLM-4.5-Air.

GLM-4.5-Air

Jul 28, 2025

1.1 years ago

GLM-5.3-Flash

Aug 26, 2026

0 days ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-4.5-Air and GLM-5.3-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-4.5-Air
✓ Preferred
GLM-5.3-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-4.5-Air vs GLM-5.3-Flash.

Which is better, GLM-4.5-Air or GLM-5.3-Flash?

GLM-5.3-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-4.5-Air is made by Zhipu AI and GLM-5.3-Flash is made by Zhipu AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GLM-4.5-Air compare to GLM-5.3-Flash in benchmarks?

GLM-4.5-Air scores MATH-500: 98.1%, AIME 2024: 89.4%, MMLU-Pro: 81.4%, TAU-bench Retail: 77.9%, BFCL-v3: 76.4%. GLM-5.3-Flash scores CharXiv-R: 89.4%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 84.3%, MMVU: 80.5%, Toolathlon: 78.4%, MVBench: 77.8%.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-4.5-Air and GLM-5.3-Flash?

GLM-4.5-Air supports an unknown number of tokens and GLM-5.3-Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-4.5-Air and GLM-5.3-Flash?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.