The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GLM-4.5 vs GPT OSS 20B

GLM-4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT OSS 20B is 8.0x cheaper per token.

Zhipu AI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GLM-4.5 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, TAU-bench Retail), while GPT OSS 20B is better at 0 benchmarks. GLM-4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, GPT OSS 20B is roughly 8.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GLM-4.5

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks

Choose GPT OSS 20B

  • cost matters — it's about 8.0x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
3 of 3
0 of 3
Input price
$0.40 / M
$0.05 / M
Output price
$1.60 / M
$0.20 / M
Context window
131,072
131,072
Released
Jul 2025
Aug 2025
License
MIT
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

GLM-4.5 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, TAU-bench Retail), while GPT OSS 20B is better at 0 benchmarks.

GLM-4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT OSS 20B costs less

For input processing, GLM-4.5 ($0.40/1M tokens) is 8.0x more expensive than GPT OSS 20B ($0.05/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-4.5 ($1.60/1M tokens) is 8.0x more expensive than GPT OSS 20B ($0.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-4.5 is more expensive than GPT OSS 20B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$1.60
Best providerDeepinfra
OpenAI
GPT OSS 20B
Input tokens$0.05
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

334.1B diff

GLM-4.5 has 334.1B more parameters than GPT OSS 20B, making it 1598.6% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5
355.0Bparameters
OpenAI
GPT OSS 20B
20.9Bparameters
355.0B
GLM-4.5
20.9B
GPT OSS 20B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 131,072 tokens. GLM-4.5 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GPT OSS 20B is limited to 32,768 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
OpenAI
GPT OSS 20B
Input131,072 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

GLM-4.5 is licensed under MIT, while GPT OSS 20B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GLM-4.5

MIT

Open weights

GPT OSS 20B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-4.5 was released on 2025-07-28, while GPT OSS 20B was released on 2025-08-05.

GPT OSS 20B is 0 month newer than GLM-4.5.

GLM-4.5

Jul 28, 2025

1.1 years ago

GPT OSS 20B

Aug 5, 2025

1.1 years ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-4.5 is available from DeepInfra, Fireworks, Novita. GPT OSS 20B is available from Novita, Fireworks, Groq, OpenAI.

GLM-4.5

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.60/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.55/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.19/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.20/1M

GPT OSS 20B

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.05/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-4.5 and GPT OSS 20B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-4.5
✓ Preferred
GPT OSS 20B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-4.5 vs GPT OSS 20B.

Which is better, GLM-4.5 or GPT OSS 20B?

GLM-4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-4.5 is made by Zhipu AI and GPT OSS 20B is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GLM-4.5 compare to GPT OSS 20B in benchmarks?

GLM-4.5 scores MATH-500: 98.2%, AIME 2024: 91.0%, MMLU-Pro: 84.6%, TAU-bench Retail: 79.7%, GPQA: 79.1%. GPT OSS 20B scores MMLU: 85.3%, CodeForces: 74.3%, GPQA: 71.5%, TAU-bench Retail: 54.8%, HealthBench: 42.5%.

Is GLM-4.5 cheaper than GPT OSS 20B?

GPT OSS 20B is 8.0x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-4.5 costs $0.40/M input and $1.60/M output via deepinfra. GPT OSS 20B costs $0.05/M input and $0.20/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-4.5 and GPT OSS 20B?

GLM-4.5 supports 131K tokens and GPT OSS 20B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-4.5 and GPT OSS 20B?

Key differences include input pricing ($0.40 vs $0.05/M), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-4.5 and GPT OSS 20B?

GLM-4.5 is developed by Zhipu AI and GPT OSS 20B is developed by OpenAI.