Model Comparison

GLM-4.7-Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1Which is better in 2026?

Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-4.7-Flash is 13.1x cheaper per token.

Verdict: GLM-4.7-Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1 — which is better?

GLM-4.7-Flash (by Zhipu AI) and Muse Spark 1.1 (by Meta) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

GLM-4.7-Flash outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Spark 1.1 is better at 1 benchmark (Humanity's Last Exam). Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, GLM-4.7-Flash is roughly 13.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Spark 1.1 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose GLM-4.7-Flash if…

  • cost matters — it's about 13.1x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Spark 1.1 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GLM-4.7-Flash outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Spark 1.1 is better at 1 benchmark (Humanity's Last Exam).

Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Jul 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-4.7-Flash costs less

For input processing, GLM-4.7-Flash ($0.07/1M tokens) is 17.9x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-4.7-Flash ($0.40/1M tokens) is 10.6x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($4.25/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Spark 1.1 is more expensive than GLM-4.7-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Jul 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7-Flash
Input tokens$0.07
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerUnknown Organization
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$4.25
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Spark 1.1 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to GLM-4.7-Flash's 128,000 tokens. Muse Spark 1.1 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GLM-4.7-Flash is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7-Flash
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Tue Jul 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Muse Spark 1.1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-4.7-Flash does not.

Muse Spark 1.1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GLM-4.7-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GLM-4.7-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Muse Spark 1.1 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GLM-4.7-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-4.7-Flash was released on 2026-01-19, while Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09.

Muse Spark 1.1 is 6 months newer than GLM-4.7-Flash.

GLM-4.7-Flash

Jan 19, 2026

6 months ago

Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

1 weeks ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-4.7-Flash is available from ZAI. Muse Spark 1.1 is available from Meta Model API.

GLM-4.7-Flash

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.07/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M

Muse Spark 1.1

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.25/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Zhipu AI
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Meta
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (62.1% vs 14.4%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-4.7-Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-4.7-Flash
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.1
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7-Flash
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-4.7-Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1.

Which is better, GLM-4.7-Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-4.7-Flash is made by Zhipu AI and Muse Spark 1.1 is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GLM-4.7-Flash compare to Muse Spark 1.1 in benchmarks?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores AIME 2025: 91.6%, Tau-bench: 79.5%, GPQA: 75.2%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.2%, BrowseComp: 42.8%. Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%.

Is GLM-4.7-Flash cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1?

GLM-4.7-Flash is 17.9x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-4.7-Flash costs $0.07/M input and $0.40/M output via z. Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-4.7-Flash and Muse Spark 1.1?

GLM-4.7-Flash supports 128K tokens and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-4.7-Flash and Muse Spark 1.1?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.07 vs $1.25/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-4.7-Flash and Muse Spark 1.1?

GLM-4.7-Flash is developed by Zhipu AI and Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons