GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nova Pro Comparison

Comparing GLM-4.7-Flash and Nova Pro across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GLM-4.7-Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Nova Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.

GLM-4.7-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-4.7-Flash costs less

For input processing, GLM-4.7-Flash ($0.07/1M tokens) is 11.4x cheaper than Nova Pro ($0.80/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-4.7-Flash ($0.40/1M tokens) is 8.0x cheaper than Nova Pro ($3.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Nova Pro is more expensive than GLM-4.7-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7-Flash
Input tokens$0.07
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerUnknown Organization
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Nova Pro accepts 300,000 input tokens compared to GLM-4.7-Flash's 128,000 tokens. Nova Pro can generate longer responses up to 300,000 tokens, while GLM-4.7-Flash is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7-Flash
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input300,000 tokens
Output300,000 tokens
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Nova Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-4.7-Flash does not.

Nova Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GLM-4.7-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GLM-4.7-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Nova Pro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GLM-4.7-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Nova Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-4.7-Flash was released on 2026-01-19, while Nova Pro was released on 2024-11-20.

GLM-4.7-Flash is 14 months newer than Nova Pro.

GLM-4.7-Flash

Jan 19, 2026

1 months ago

1.2yr newer
Nova Pro

Nov 20, 2024

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-4.7-Flash is available from ZAI. Nova Pro is available from Bedrock. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

GLM-4.7-Flash

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.07/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M

Nova Pro

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (75.2% vs 46.9%)
Larger context window (300,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7-Flash
Amazon
Nova Pro