Model Comparison
GLM-4.7 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
GLM-4.7 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
GLM-4.7 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.
GLM-4.7 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct has 122.0B more parameters than GLM-4.7, making it 34.1% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only GLM-4.7 specifies input context (202,800 tokens). Only GLM-4.7 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
GLM-4.7 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct does not.
GLM-4.7 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
GLM-4.7
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
License
Usage and distribution terms
GLM-4.7 is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
GLM-4.7 was released on 2025-12-22, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct was released on 2025-01-31.
GLM-4.7 is 11 months newer than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.
Dec 22, 2025
3 months ago
10mo newerJan 31, 2025
1.2 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
GLM-4.7
View detailsZhipu AI
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about GLM-4.7 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct