GLM-5 vs DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking) Comparison

Comparing GLM-5 and DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking) across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

GLM-5 and DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking) don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking) costs less

For input processing, GLM-5 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 3.6x more expensive than DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking) ($0.28/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5 ($3.20/1M tokens) is 7.6x more expensive than DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking) ($0.42/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5 is more expensive than DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerUnknown Organization
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking)
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$0.42
Best providerDeepSeek
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

59.0B diff

GLM-5 has 59.0B more parameters than DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking), making it 8.6% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
744.0Bparameters
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking)
685.0Bparameters
744.0B
GLM-5
685.0B
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GLM-5 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking)'s 131,072 tokens. GLM-5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking) is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking)
Input131,072 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

GLM-5

MIT

Open weights

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking)

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5 was released on 2026-02-11, while DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking) was released on 2025-12-01.

GLM-5 is 2 months newer than DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking).

GLM-5

Feb 11, 2026

1 months ago

2mo newer
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking)

Dec 1, 2025

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-5 is available from ZAI. DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking) is available from DeepSeek. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

GLM-5

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking)

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.42/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking)