Model Comparison

GLM-5 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-MaxWhich is better in 2026?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max is 8.9x cheaper per token.

Verdict: GLM-5 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max — which is better?

GLM-5 (by Zhipu AI) and DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max (by DeepSeek) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

GLM-5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (BrowseComp), while DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max is better at 3 benchmarks (MCP Atlas, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0). DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

On price, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max is roughly 8.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose GLM-5 if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.00/M input and $3.20/M output

Choose DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 8.9x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2026
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

GLM-5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (BrowseComp), while DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max is better at 3 benchmarks (MCP Atlas, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0).

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Jun 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max costs less

For input processing, GLM-5 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 7.1x more expensive than DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max ($0.14/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5 ($3.20/1M tokens) is 11.4x more expensive than DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max ($0.28/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5 is more expensive than DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Jun 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerFriendliAI
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max
Input tokens$0.14
Output tokens$0.28
Best providerDeepSeek
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

460.0B diff

GLM-5 has 460.0B more parameters than DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max, making it 162.0% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
744.0Bparameters
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max
284.0Bparameters
744.0B
GLM-5
284.0B
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to GLM-5's 200,000 tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max can generate longer responses up to 393,216 tokens, while GLM-5 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output393,216 tokens
Mon Jun 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

GLM-5

MIT

Open weights

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5 was released on 2026-02-11, while DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max was released on 2026-04-23.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max is 2 months newer than GLM-5.

GLM-5

Feb 11, 2026

3 months ago

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max

Apr 23, 2026

1 months ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-5 is available from FriendliAI, ZAI. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max is available from DeepSeek.

GLM-5

friendli logo
FriendliAI
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Zhipu AI
Higher BrowseComp score (75.9% vs 73.2%)
DeepSeek
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher MCP Atlas score (69.0% vs 67.8%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (79.0% vs 77.8%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (56.9% vs 56.2%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max.

Which is better, GLM-5 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. GLM-5 is made by Zhipu AI and DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GLM-5 compare to DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max in benchmarks?

GLM-5 scores t2-bench: 89.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 77.8%, BrowseComp: 75.9%, MCP Atlas: 67.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.0: 56.2%. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max scores CodeForces: 100.0%, HMMT Feb 26: 94.8%, LiveCodeBench: 91.6%, IMO-AnswerBench: 88.4%, GPQA: 88.1%.

Is GLM-5 cheaper than DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max is 7.1x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5 costs $1.00/M input and $3.20/M output via friendli. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max costs $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output via deepseek.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5 and DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max?

GLM-5 supports 200K tokens and DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5 and DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($1.00 vs $0.14/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5 and DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max?

GLM-5 is developed by Zhipu AI and DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max is developed by DeepSeek.

Related comparisons