GLM-5 vs GLM-4.7 Comparison

Comparing GLM-5 and GLM-4.7 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

GLM-5 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (BrowseComp, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while GLM-4.7 is better at 0 benchmarks.

GLM-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-4.7 costs less

For input processing, GLM-5 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than GLM-4.7 ($0.60/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5 ($3.20/1M tokens) is 1.5x more expensive than GLM-4.7 ($2.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5 is more expensive than GLM-4.7.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerUnknown Organization
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7
Input tokens$0.60
Output tokens$2.20
Best providerFireworks
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

386.0B diff

GLM-5 has 386.0B more parameters than GLM-4.7, making it 107.8% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
744.0Bparameters
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7
358.0Bparameters
744.0B
GLM-5
358.0B
GLM-4.7

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GLM-4.7 accepts 202,800 input tokens compared to GLM-5's 200,000 tokens. GLM-4.7 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GLM-5 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7
Input202,800 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GLM-4.7 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-5 does not.

GLM-4.7 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GLM-5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GLM-4.7

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

GLM-5

MIT

Open weights

GLM-4.7

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5 was released on 2026-02-11, while GLM-4.7 was released on 2025-12-22.

GLM-5 is 2 months newer than GLM-4.7.

GLM-5

Feb 11, 2026

1 months ago

1mo newer
GLM-4.7

Dec 22, 2025

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-5 is available from ZAI. GLM-4.7 is available from Fireworks, Novita. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

GLM-5

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M

GLM-4.7

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.20/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher BrowseComp score (75.9% vs 52.0%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (77.8% vs 73.8%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (56.2% vs 41.0%)
Larger context window (202,800 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7