Model Comparison

GLM-5 vs Grok 4 FastWhich is better in 2026?

GLM-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Grok 4 Fast is 5.6x cheaper per token.

Verdict: GLM-5 vs Grok 4 Fast — which is better?

GLM-5 (by Zhipu AI) and Grok 4 Fast (by xAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

GLM-5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (BrowseComp), while Grok 4 Fast is better at 0 benchmarks. GLM-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Grok 4 Fast is roughly 5.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Grok 4 Fast also accepts a larger context window (2,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose GLM-5 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Grok 4 Fast if…

  • cost matters — it's about 5.6x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 2,000,000 token context window

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GLM-5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (BrowseComp), while Grok 4 Fast is better at 0 benchmarks.

GLM-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Jun 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Grok 4 Fast costs less

For input processing, GLM-5 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than Grok 4 Fast ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5 ($3.20/1M tokens) is 6.4x more expensive than Grok 4 Fast ($0.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5 is more expensive than Grok 4 Fast.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Jun 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerFriendliAI
xAI
Grok 4 Fast
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerxAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Grok 4 Fast accepts 2,000,000 input tokens compared to GLM-5's 200,000 tokens. GLM-5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Grok 4 Fast is limited to 30,000 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
xAI
Grok 4 Fast
Input2,000,000 tokens
Output30,000 tokens
Mon Jun 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Grok 4 Fast supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-5 does not.

Grok 4 Fast can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GLM-5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok 4 Fast

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GLM-5 is licensed under MIT, while Grok 4 Fast uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GLM-5

MIT

Open weights

Grok 4 Fast

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5 was released on 2026-02-11, while Grok 4 Fast was released on 2025-08-28.

GLM-5 is 6 months newer than Grok 4 Fast.

GLM-5

Feb 11, 2026

3 months ago

5mo newer
Grok 4 Fast

Aug 28, 2025

9 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-5 is available from FriendliAI, ZAI. Grok 4 Fast is available from xAI.

GLM-5

friendli logo
FriendliAI
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M

Grok 4 Fast

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Has open weights
Higher BrowseComp score (75.9% vs 44.9%)
Larger context window (2,000,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
xAI
Grok 4 Fast

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5 vs Grok 4 Fast.

Which is better, GLM-5 or Grok 4 Fast?

GLM-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-5 is made by Zhipu AI and Grok 4 Fast is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GLM-5 compare to Grok 4 Fast in benchmarks?

GLM-5 scores t2-bench: 89.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 77.8%, BrowseComp: 75.9%, MCP Atlas: 67.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.0: 56.2%. Grok 4 Fast scores SimpleQA: 95.0%, HMMT 2025: 93.3%, AIME 2025: 92.0%, GPQA: 85.7%, LiveCodeBench: 80.0%.

Is GLM-5 cheaper than Grok 4 Fast?

Grok 4 Fast is 5.0x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5 costs $1.00/M input and $3.20/M output via friendli. Grok 4 Fast costs $0.20/M input and $0.50/M output via xai.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5 and Grok 4 Fast?

GLM-5 supports 200K tokens and Grok 4 Fast supports 2.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5 and Grok 4 Fast?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 2.0M), input pricing ($1.00 vs $0.20/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5 and Grok 4 Fast?

GLM-5 is developed by Zhipu AI and Grok 4 Fast is developed by xAI.