Model Comparison

GLM-5 vs Llama 4 ScoutWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing GLM-5 and Llama 4 Scout across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: GLM-5 vs Llama 4 Scout — which is better?

GLM-5 (by Zhipu AI) and Llama 4 Scout (by Meta) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, Llama 4 Scout is roughly 11.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Llama 4 Scout also accepts a larger context window (10,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose GLM-5 if…

you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026

Choose Llama 4 Scout if…

cost matters — it's about 11.5x cheaper per token
you process long inputs — it offers a 10,000,000 token context window

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

GLM-5 and Llama 4 Scout don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 4 Scout costs less

For input processing, GLM-5 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 12.5x more expensive than Llama 4 Scout ($0.08/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5 ($3.20/1M tokens) is 10.7x more expensive than Llama 4 Scout ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5 is more expensive than Llama 4 Scout.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

GLM-5

Input tokens$1.00

Output tokens$3.20

Best providerFriendliAI

Llama 4 Scout

Input tokens$0.08

Output tokens$0.30

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

635.0B diff

GLM-5 has 635.0B more parameters than Llama 4 Scout, making it 582.6% larger.

GLM-5

744.0Bparameters

Llama 4 Scout

109.0Bparameters

744.0B

GLM-5

109.0B

Llama 4 Scout

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Llama 4 Scout accepts 10,000,000 input tokens compared to GLM-5's 200,000 tokens. Llama 4 Scout can generate longer responses up to 10,000,000 tokens, while GLM-5 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

GLM-5

Input200,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Llama 4 Scout

Input10,000,000 tokens

Output10,000,000 tokens

Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-5 does not.

Llama 4 Scout can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GLM-5

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Llama 4 Scout

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GLM-5 is licensed under MIT, while Llama 4 Scout uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GLM-5

MIT

Open weights

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5 was released on 2026-02-11, while Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05.

GLM-5 is 10 months newer than Llama 4 Scout.

GLM-5

Feb 11, 2026

3 months ago

10mo newer

Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-5 is available from FriendliAI, ZAI. Llama 4 Scout is available from DeepInfra, Lambda, Novita, Groq, Fireworks, Together.

GLM-5

FriendliAI

Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M

Unknown Organization

Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M

Llama 4 Scout

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Lambda

Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Groq

Input Price:Input: $0.11/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.34/1M

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Together

Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.59/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

GLM-5

View details

Zhipu AI

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	GLM-5	Llama 4 Scout

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5 vs Llama 4 Scout.

Which is better, GLM-5 or Llama 4 Scout?

GLM-5 (Zhipu AI) and Llama 4 Scout (Meta) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does GLM-5 compare to Llama 4 Scout in benchmarks?

GLM-5 scores t2-bench: 89.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 77.8%, BrowseComp: 75.9%, MCP Atlas: 67.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.0: 56.2%. Llama 4 Scout scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 90.6%, ChartQA: 88.8%, MMLU: 79.6%, MMLU-Pro: 74.3%.

Is GLM-5 cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is 12.5x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5 costs $1.00/M input and $3.20/M output via friendli. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.08/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5 and Llama 4 Scout?

GLM-5 supports 200K tokens and Llama 4 Scout supports 10.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5 and Llama 4 Scout?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 10.0M), input pricing ($1.00 vs $0.08/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Llama 4 Community License Agreement). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5 and Llama 4 Scout?

GLM-5 is developed by Zhipu AI and Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta.

GLM-5 vs Llama 4 ScoutWhich is better in 2026?

Verdict: GLM-5 vs Llama 4 Scout — which is better?

Choose GLM-5 if…

Choose Llama 4 Scout if…

Performance Benchmarks

Arena Performance

Pricing Analysis

Model Size

Context Window

Input Capabilities

GLM-5

Llama 4 Scout

License

Release Timeline

Knowledge Cutoff

Provider Availability

GLM-5

Llama 4 Scout

Outputs Comparison

Key Takeaways

GLM-5

Llama 4 Scout

Detailed Comparison

FAQ

Which is better, GLM-5 or Llama 4 Scout?

How does GLM-5 compare to Llama 4 Scout in benchmarks?

Is GLM-5 cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5 and Llama 4 Scout?

What are the main differences between GLM-5 and Llama 4 Scout?

Who makes GLM-5 and Llama 4 Scout?

More GLM-5 comparisons

More Llama 4 Scout comparisons

GLM-5 vs Llama 4 ScoutWhich is better in 2026?

Verdict: GLM-5 vs Llama 4 Scout — which is better?

Choose GLM-5 if…

Choose Llama 4 Scout if…

Performance Benchmarks

Arena Performance

Pricing Analysis

Model Size

Context Window

Input Capabilities

GLM-5

Llama 4 Scout

License

Release Timeline

Knowledge Cutoff

Provider Availability

GLM-5

Llama 4 Scout

Outputs Comparison

Key Takeaways

GLM-5

Llama 4 Scout

Detailed Comparison

Which is better, GLM-5 or Llama 4 Scout?

How does GLM-5 compare to Llama 4 Scout in benchmarks?

Is GLM-5 cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5 and Llama 4 Scout?

What are the main differences between GLM-5 and Llama 4 Scout?

Who makes GLM-5 and Llama 4 Scout?

Related comparisons

More GLM-5 comparisons

More Llama 4 Scout comparisons