Model Comparison

GLM-5 vs Phi 4 ReasoningWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing GLM-5 and Phi 4 Reasoning across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: GLM-5 vs Phi 4 Reasoning — which is better?

GLM-5 (by Zhipu AI) and Phi 4 Reasoning (by Microsoft) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Choose GLM-5 if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning if…

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

GLM-5 and Phi 4 Reasoning don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

730.0B diff

GLM-5 has 730.0B more parameters than Phi 4 Reasoning, making it 5214.3% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
744.0Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
14.0Bparameters
744.0B
GLM-5
14.0B
Phi 4 Reasoning

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GLM-5 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only GLM-5 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

GLM-5

MIT

Open weights

Phi 4 Reasoning

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5 was released on 2026-02-11, while Phi 4 Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30.

GLM-5 is 10 months newer than Phi 4 Reasoning.

GLM-5

Feb 11, 2026

3 months ago

9mo newer
Phi 4 Reasoning

Apr 30, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while GLM-5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without GLM-5's cutoff date.

GLM-5

—

Phi 4 Reasoning

Mar 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Zhipu AI
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Microsoft

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5 vs Phi 4 Reasoning.

Which is better, GLM-5 or Phi 4 Reasoning?

GLM-5 (Zhipu AI) and Phi 4 Reasoning (Microsoft) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does GLM-5 compare to Phi 4 Reasoning in benchmarks?

GLM-5 scores t2-bench: 89.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 77.8%, BrowseComp: 75.9%, MCP Atlas: 67.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.0: 56.2%. Phi 4 Reasoning scores FlenQA: 97.7%, HumanEval+: 92.9%, IFEval: 83.4%, OmniMath: 76.6%, AIME 2024: 75.3%.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5 and Phi 4 Reasoning?

GLM-5 supports 200K tokens and Phi 4 Reasoning supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes GLM-5 and Phi 4 Reasoning?

GLM-5 is developed by Zhipu AI and Phi 4 Reasoning is developed by Microsoft.

Related comparisons