Model Comparison

GLM-5 vs Pixtral-12BWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing GLM-5 and Pixtral-12B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: GLM-5 vs Pixtral-12B — which is better?

GLM-5 (by Zhipu AI) and Pixtral-12B (by Mistral AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, Pixtral-12B is roughly 10.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GLM-5 also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose GLM-5 if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026

Choose Pixtral-12B if…

  • cost matters — it's about 10.3x cheaper per token
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

GLM-5 and Pixtral-12B don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Pixtral-12B costs less

For input processing, GLM-5 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 6.7x more expensive than Pixtral-12B ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5 ($3.20/1M tokens) is 21.3x more expensive than Pixtral-12B ($0.15/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5 is more expensive than Pixtral-12B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerFriendliAI
Mistral AI
Pixtral-12B
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.15
Best providerMistral
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

731.6B diff

GLM-5 has 731.6B more parameters than Pixtral-12B, making it 5900.0% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
744.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Pixtral-12B
12.4Bparameters
744.0B
GLM-5
12.4B
Pixtral-12B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GLM-5 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Pixtral-12B's 128,000 tokens. GLM-5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Pixtral-12B is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mistral AI
Pixtral-12B
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Pixtral-12B supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-5 does not.

Pixtral-12B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GLM-5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Pixtral-12B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GLM-5 is licensed under MIT, while Pixtral-12B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GLM-5

MIT

Open weights

Pixtral-12B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5 was released on 2026-02-11, while Pixtral-12B was released on 2024-09-17.

GLM-5 is 17 months newer than Pixtral-12B.

GLM-5

Feb 11, 2026

3 months ago

1.4yr newer
Pixtral-12B

Sep 17, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-5 is available from FriendliAI, ZAI. Pixtral-12B is available from Mistral AI.

GLM-5

friendli logo
FriendliAI
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M

Pixtral-12B

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.15/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Zhipu AI
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Mistral AI
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Mistral AI
Pixtral-12B

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5 vs Pixtral-12B.

Which is better, GLM-5 or Pixtral-12B?

GLM-5 (Zhipu AI) and Pixtral-12B (Mistral AI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does GLM-5 compare to Pixtral-12B in benchmarks?

GLM-5 scores t2-bench: 89.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 77.8%, BrowseComp: 75.9%, MCP Atlas: 67.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.0: 56.2%. Pixtral-12B scores DocVQA: 90.7%, ChartQA: 81.8%, VQAv2: 78.6%, MT-Bench: 76.8%, HumanEval: 72.0%.

Is GLM-5 cheaper than Pixtral-12B?

Pixtral-12B is 6.7x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5 costs $1.00/M input and $3.20/M output via friendli. Pixtral-12B costs $0.15/M input and $0.15/M output via mistral.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5 and Pixtral-12B?

GLM-5 supports 200K tokens and Pixtral-12B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5 and Pixtral-12B?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 128K), input pricing ($1.00 vs $0.15/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5 and Pixtral-12B?

GLM-5 is developed by Zhipu AI and Pixtral-12B is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons