The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GLM-5.3-Flash vs Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle)

GLM-5.3-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.6 to 8.8.

Zhipu AI · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GLM-5.3-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.6 to 8.8, ranking #11 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GLM-5.3-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.6 and ranks #11 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle)

  • you are already invested in the Mistral AI ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
51.6
#11
8.8
#258
50.3
#13
9.0
#249
37.8
#22
1.2
#216
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.15 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for GLM-5.3-Flash · 5 for Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle)

No common benchmarks found

GLM-5.3-Flash and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

355.0B diff

Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle) has 355.0B more parameters than GLM-5.3-Flash, making it 110.9% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3-Flash
320.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle)
675.0Bparameters
320.0B
GLM-5.3-Flash
675.0B
Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GLM-5.3-Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only GLM-5.3-Flash specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3-Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GLM-5.3-Flash and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GLM-5.3-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GLM-5.3-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle) uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GLM-5.3-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle)

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5.3-Flash was released on 2026-08-26, while Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle) was released on 2025-12-04.

GLM-5.3-Flash is 9 months newer than Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle).

GLM-5.3-Flash

Aug 26, 2026

2 days ago

8mo newer
Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle)

Dec 4, 2025

8 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-5.3-Flash and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-5.3-Flash
✓ Preferred
Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5.3-Flash vs Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle).

Which is better, GLM-5.3-Flash or Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle)?

GLM-5.3-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.6 to 8.8. GLM-5.3-Flash is made by Zhipu AI and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle) is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GLM-5.3-Flash compare to Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle) in benchmarks?

GLM-5.3-Flash scores CharXiv-R: 89.4%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 84.3%, MMVU: 80.5%, Toolathlon: 78.4%, Chartography: 78.0%. Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle) scores MMMLU: 85.5%, AMC_2022_23: 52.0%, GPQA: 43.9%, LiveCodeBench: 34.4%, SimpleQA: 23.8%.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5.3-Flash and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle)?

GLM-5.3-Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5.3-Flash and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.6 vs 8.8), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5.3-Flash and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle)?

GLM-5.3-Flash is developed by Zhipu AI and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 Eagle) is developed by Mistral AI.