The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GLM-5.3 vs Grok 4.5

GLM-5.3 leads the LLM Stats Score 54.2 to 47.0. GLM-5.3 is 1.4x cheaper per token.

Zhipu AI · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GLM-5.3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 54.2 to 47.0, ranking #6 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GLM-5.3 wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, GLM-5.3 is roughly 1.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GLM-5.3 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GLM-5.3

  • overall performance matters — it scores 54.2 and ranks #6 on LLM Stats
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 1.4x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Grok 4.5

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.00/M input and $6.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
54.2
#6
47.0
#19
53.4
#5
45.5
#26
45.4
#6
38.7
#16
41.2
#5
33.6
#20
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 3
0 of 3
Input price
$1.40 / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
$4.40 / M
$6.00 / M
Context window
1,048,576
500,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GLM-5.3
Grok 4.5
35.4#2
24.5#31
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for GLM-5.3 · 14 for Grok 4.5

3 shared

GLM-5.3 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, SWE-Marathon, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Grok 4.5 is better at 0 benchmarks.

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-5.3 costs less

For input processing, GLM-5.3 ($1.40/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than Grok 4.5 ($2.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5.3 ($4.40/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than Grok 4.5 ($6.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok 4.5 is more expensive than GLM-5.3.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input tokens$1.40
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerNovita
xAI
Grok 4.5
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$6.00
Best providerxAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GLM-5.3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Grok 4.5's 500,000 tokens. Only GLM-5.3 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
xAI
Grok 4.5
Input500,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Grok 4.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-5.3 does not.

Grok 4.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GLM-5.3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5.3 was released on 2026-08-14, while Grok 4.5 was released on 2026-07-16.

GLM-5.3 is 1 month newer than Grok 4.5.

GLM-5.3

Aug 14, 2026

2 weeks ago

4w newer
Grok 4.5

Jul 16, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-02-01, while GLM-5.3's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok 4.5's training data extends to 2026-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without GLM-5.3's cutoff date.

GLM-5.3

Grok 4.5

Feb 2026

Provider Availability

GLM-5.3 is available from Novita, ZAI. Grok 4.5 is available from xAI.

GLM-5.3

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $1.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M
z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M

Grok 4.5

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-5.3 and Grok 4.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-5.3
✓ Preferred
Grok 4.5
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5.3 vs Grok 4.5.

Which is better, GLM-5.3 or Grok 4.5?

GLM-5.3 leads the LLM Stats Score 54.2 to 47.0. GLM-5.3 is made by Zhipu AI and Grok 4.5 is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GLM-5.3 compare to Grok 4.5 in benchmarks?

GLM-5.3 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.2%, CyberGym: 84.5%, FrontierSWE: 78.1%, Toolathlon: 73.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 66.9%. Grok 4.5 scores GPQA: 93.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 83.3%, SWE-Bench Pro: 64.7%, AA-Omniscience Index: 63.0%, DeepSWE 1.0: 62.0%.

Is GLM-5.3 cheaper than Grok 4.5?

GLM-5.3 is 1.4x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5.3 costs $1.40/M input and $4.40/M output via novita. Grok 4.5 costs $2.00/M input and $6.00/M output via xai.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5.3 and Grok 4.5?

GLM-5.3 supports 1.0M tokens and Grok 4.5 supports 500K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5.3 and Grok 4.5?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (54.2 vs 47.0), context window (1.0M vs 500K), input pricing ($1.40 vs $2.00/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5.3 and Grok 4.5?

GLM-5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI and Grok 4.5 is developed by xAI.