Model Comparison

GPT-4 vs Claude 3 Haiku

GPT-4 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Claude 3 Haiku is 75.0x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

GPT-4 outperforms in 5 benchmarks (DROP, GPQA, HellaSwag, MATH, MMLU), while Claude 3 Haiku is better at 2 benchmarks (HumanEval, MGSM).

GPT-4 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude 3 Haiku costs less

For input processing, GPT-4 ($30.00/1M tokens) is 120.0x more expensive than Claude 3 Haiku ($0.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-4 ($60.00/1M tokens) is 48.0x more expensive than Claude 3 Haiku ($1.25/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4 is more expensive than Claude 3 Haiku.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-4
Input tokens$30.00
Output tokens$60.00
Best providerAzure
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.25
Best providerAnthropic
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3 Haiku accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to GPT-4's 32,768 tokens. Claude 3 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while GPT-4 is limited to 32,768 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-4
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both GPT-4 and Claude 3 Haiku support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Claude 3 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-4

Proprietary

Closed source

Claude 3 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4 was released on 2023-06-13, while Claude 3 Haiku was released on 2024-03-13.

Claude 3 Haiku is 9 months newer than GPT-4.

GPT-4

Jun 13, 2023

2.8 years ago

Claude 3 Haiku

Mar 13, 2024

2.1 years ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2022-12-31, while Claude 3 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4's training data extends to 2022-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3 Haiku's cutoff date.

GPT-4

Dec 2022

Claude 3 Haiku

—

Provider Availability

GPT-4 is available from Azure, OpenAI. Claude 3 Haiku is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google.

GPT-4

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $30.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $30.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M

Claude 3 Haiku

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Higher DROP score (80.9% vs 78.4%)
Higher GPQA score (35.7% vs 33.3%)
Higher HellaSwag score (95.3% vs 85.9%)
Higher MATH score (42.0% vs 38.9%)
Higher MMLU score (86.4% vs 75.2%)
Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher HumanEval score (75.9% vs 67.0%)
Higher MGSM score (75.1% vs 74.5%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-4
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4 vs Claude 3 Haiku

GPT-4 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. GPT-4 is made by OpenAI and Claude 3 Haiku is made by Anthropic. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
GPT-4 scores AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC): 96.3%, HellaSwag: 95.3%, Uniform Bar Exam: 90.0%, SAT Math: 89.0%, LSAT: 88.0%. Claude 3 Haiku scores ARC-C: 89.2%, GSM8k: 88.9%, HellaSwag: 85.9%, DROP: 78.4%, HumanEval: 75.9%.
Claude 3 Haiku is 120.0x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-4 costs $30.00/M input and $60.00/M output via azure. Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/M input and $1.25/M output via anthropic.
GPT-4 supports 33K tokens and Claude 3 Haiku supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (33K vs 200K), input pricing ($30.00 vs $0.25/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
GPT-4 is developed by OpenAI and Claude 3 Haiku is developed by Anthropic.