Model Comparison

GPT-4 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

GPT-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

GPT-4 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (HellaSwag, MMLU, Winogrande), while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Apr 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Apr 04 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-4
Input tokens$30.00
Output tokens$60.00
Best providerAzure
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-4 specifies input context (32,768 tokens). Only GPT-4 specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-4
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Apr 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not.

GPT-4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct uses Llama 3.1 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4 was released on 2023-06-13, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct was released on 2024-10-01.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is 16 months newer than GPT-4.

GPT-4

Jun 13, 2023

2.8 years ago

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Oct 1, 2024

1.5 years ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4 has a knowledge cutoff of 2022-12-31, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a cutoff of 2023-12-01.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has more recent training data (up to 2023-12-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to GPT-4 (2022-12-31).

GPT-4

Dec 2022

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Dec 2023

1 yr newer

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Larger context window (32,768 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher HellaSwag score (95.3% vs 85.6%)
Higher MMLU score (86.4% vs 80.2%)
Higher Winogrande score (87.5% vs 84.5%)
NVIDIA
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-4
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

GPT-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-4 is made by OpenAI and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
GPT-4 scores AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC): 96.3%, HellaSwag: 95.3%, Uniform Bar Exam: 90.0%, SAT Math: 89.0%, LSAT: 88.0%. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.4%, HellaSwag: 85.6%, Winogrande: 84.5%, GSM8K Chat: 81.9%, MMLU Chat: 80.6%.
GPT-4 supports 33K tokens and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 3.1 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
GPT-4 is developed by OpenAI and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is developed by NVIDIA.