Model Comparison

GPT-4 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is 76.9x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GPT-4 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri May 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking costs less

For input processing, GPT-4 ($30.00/1M tokens) is 200.0x more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-4 ($60.00/1M tokens) is 40.0x more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking ($1.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4 is more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri May 29 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-4
Input tokens$30.00
Output tokens$60.00
Best providerAzure
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking accepts 65,536 input tokens compared to GPT-4's 32,768 tokens. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while GPT-4 is limited to 32,768 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-4
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input65,536 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Fri May 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking does not.

GPT-4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4 was released on 2023-06-13, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking was released on 2025-09-10.

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is 27 months newer than GPT-4.

GPT-4

Jun 13, 2023

3.0 years ago

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Sep 10, 2025

8 months ago

2.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2022-12-31, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4's training data extends to 2022-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking's cutoff date.

GPT-4

Dec 2022

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

—

Provider Availability

GPT-4 is available from Azure, OpenAI. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is available from Novita.

GPT-4

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $30.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $30.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Supports multimodal inputs
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Larger context window (65,536 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (77.2% vs 35.7%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-4
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.

Which is better, GPT-4 or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-4 is made by OpenAI and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GPT-4 compare to Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking in benchmarks?

GPT-4 scores AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC): 96.3%, HellaSwag: 95.3%, Uniform Bar Exam: 90.0%, SAT Math: 89.0%, LSAT: 88.0%. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking scores MMLU-Redux: 92.5%, IFEval: 88.9%, AIME 2025: 87.8%, WritingBench: 84.6%, MMLU-Pro: 82.7%.

Is GPT-4 cheaper than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is 200.0x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-4 costs $30.00/M input and $60.00/M output via azure. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking costs $0.15/M input and $1.50/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

GPT-4 supports 33K tokens and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking supports 66K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Key differences include context window (33K vs 66K), input pricing ($30.00 vs $0.15/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-4 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

GPT-4 is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.