Model Comparison

GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 3 Opus

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. GPT-4 Turbo is 2.0x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

GPT-4 Turbo outperforms in 3 benchmarks (DROP, HumanEval, MATH), while Claude 3 Opus is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MGSM, MMLU).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Fri Apr 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-4 Turbo costs less

For input processing, GPT-4 Turbo ($10.00/1M tokens) is 1.5x cheaper than Claude 3 Opus ($15.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-4 Turbo ($30.00/1M tokens) is 2.5x cheaper than Claude 3 Opus ($75.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3 Opus is more expensive than GPT-4 Turbo.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 10 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo
Input tokens$10.00
Output tokens$30.00
Best providerAzure
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$75.00
Best providerAnthropic
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3 Opus accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to GPT-4 Turbo's 128,000 tokens. Claude 3 Opus can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while GPT-4 Turbo is limited to 4,096 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo
Input128,000 tokens
Output4,096 tokens
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Fri Apr 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude 3 Opus supports multimodal inputs, whereas GPT-4 Turbo does not.

Claude 3 Opus can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-4 Turbo

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Claude 3 Opus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-4 Turbo

Proprietary

Closed source

Claude 3 Opus

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4 Turbo was released on 2024-04-09, while Claude 3 Opus was released on 2024-02-29.

GPT-4 Turbo is 1 month newer than Claude 3 Opus.

GPT-4 Turbo

Apr 9, 2024

2.0 years ago

1mo newer
Claude 3 Opus

Feb 29, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4 Turbo has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Claude 3 Opus's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4 Turbo's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3 Opus's cutoff date.

GPT-4 Turbo

Dec 2023

Claude 3 Opus

—

Provider Availability

GPT-4 Turbo is available from Azure, OpenAI. Claude 3 Opus is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google.

GPT-4 Turbo

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $30.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $30.00/1M

Claude 3 Opus

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher DROP score (86.0% vs 83.1%)
Higher HumanEval score (87.1% vs 84.9%)
Higher MATH score (72.6% vs 60.1%)
Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (50.4% vs 48.0%)
Higher MGSM score (90.7% vs 88.5%)
Higher MMLU score (86.8% vs 86.5%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 3 Opus

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. GPT-4 Turbo is made by OpenAI and Claude 3 Opus is made by Anthropic. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
GPT-4 Turbo scores MGSM: 88.5%, HumanEval: 87.1%, MMLU: 86.5%, DROP: 86.0%, MATH: 72.6%. Claude 3 Opus scores ARC-C: 96.4%, HellaSwag: 95.4%, GSM8k: 95.0%, MGSM: 90.7%, BIG-Bench Hard: 86.8%.
GPT-4 Turbo is 1.5x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-4 Turbo costs $10.00/M input and $30.00/M output via azure. Claude 3 Opus costs $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output via anthropic.
GPT-4 Turbo supports 128K tokens and Claude 3 Opus supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (128K vs 200K), input pricing ($10.00 vs $15.00/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
GPT-4 Turbo is developed by OpenAI and Claude 3 Opus is developed by Anthropic.