Model Comparison

GPT-4 Turbo vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

GPT-4 Turbo significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GPT-4 Turbo outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-4 Turbo significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Apr 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Apr 12 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo
Input tokens$10.00
Output tokens$30.00
Best providerAzure
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-4 Turbo specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only GPT-4 Turbo specifies output context (4,096 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo
Input128,000 tokens
Output4,096 tokens
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Apr 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4 Turbo is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct uses Llama 3.1 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4 Turbo

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4 Turbo was released on 2024-04-09, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct was released on 2024-10-01.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is 6 months newer than GPT-4 Turbo.

GPT-4 Turbo

Apr 9, 2024

2.0 years ago

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Oct 1, 2024

1.5 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4 Turbo has a knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a cutoff of 2023-12-01.

GPT-4 Turbo has more recent training data (up to 2023-12-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct (2023-12-01).

GPT-4 Turbo

Dec 2023

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Dec 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Higher MMLU score (86.5% vs 80.2%)
NVIDIA
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4 Turbo vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

GPT-4 Turbo significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-4 Turbo is made by OpenAI and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
GPT-4 Turbo scores MGSM: 88.5%, HumanEval: 87.1%, MMLU: 86.5%, DROP: 86.0%, MATH: 72.6%. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.4%, HellaSwag: 85.6%, Winogrande: 84.5%, GSM8K Chat: 81.9%, MMLU Chat: 80.6%.
GPT-4 Turbo supports 128K tokens and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 3.1 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
GPT-4 Turbo is developed by OpenAI and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is developed by NVIDIA.