Model Comparison

GPT-4.1 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

GPT-4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is 9.7x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

GPT-4.1 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, IFEval), while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun May 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs less

For input processing, GPT-4.1 ($2.00/1M tokens) is 5.7x more expensive than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.35/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-4.1 ($8.00/1M tokens) is 20.0x more expensive than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4.1 is more expensive than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun May 31 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-4.1
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$8.00
Best providerOpenAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input tokens$0.35
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-4.1 accepts 1,047,576 input tokens compared to Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's 131,072 tokens. GPT-4.1 can generate longer responses up to 32,768 tokens, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is limited to 8,192 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-4.1
Input1,047,576 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Sun May 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-4.1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 72B Instruct does not.

GPT-4.1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-4.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4.1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct uses Qwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Qwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4.1 was released on 2025-04-14, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

GPT-4.1 is 7 months newer than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.

GPT-4.1

Apr 14, 2025

1.1 years ago

6mo newer
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4.1 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4.1's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's cutoff date.

GPT-4.1

Jun 2024

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Provider Availability

GPT-4.1 is available from OpenAI. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks, Together.

GPT-4.1

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $8.00/1M

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.35/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (1,047,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (66.3% vs 49.0%)
Higher IFEval score (87.4% vs 84.1%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
OpenAIGPT-4.1
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen2.5 72B Instruct

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-4.1
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4.1 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.

Which is better, GPT-4.1 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

GPT-4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-4.1 is made by OpenAI and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GPT-4.1 compare to Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in benchmarks?

GPT-4.1 scores MMLU: 90.2%, CharXiv-D: 87.9%, IFEval: 87.4%, MMMLU: 87.3%, MMMU: 74.8%. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.8%, MT-Bench: 93.5%, MBPP: 88.2%, MMLU-Redux: 86.8%, HumanEval: 86.6%.

Is GPT-4.1 cheaper than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is 5.7x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-4.1 costs $2.00/M input and $8.00/M output via openai. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.35/M input and $0.40/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4.1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

GPT-4.1 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4.1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 131K), input pricing ($2.00 vs $0.35/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Qwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-4.1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

GPT-4.1 is developed by OpenAI and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.