Model Comparison

GPT-4.1 mini vs Jamba 1.5 Large

GPT-4.1 mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-4.1 mini is 5.0x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

GPT-4.1 mini outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU), while Jamba 1.5 Large is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-4.1 mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-4.1 mini costs less

For input processing, GPT-4.1 mini ($0.40/1M tokens) is 5.0x cheaper than Jamba 1.5 Large ($2.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-4.1 mini ($1.60/1M tokens) is 5.0x cheaper than Jamba 1.5 Large ($8.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Jamba 1.5 Large is more expensive than GPT-4.1 mini.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 mini
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$1.60
Best providerOpenAI
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$8.00
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-4.1 mini accepts 1,047,576 input tokens compared to Jamba 1.5 Large's 256,000 tokens. Jamba 1.5 Large can generate longer responses up to 256,000 tokens, while GPT-4.1 mini is limited to 32,768 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-4.1 mini
Input1,047,576 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-4.1 mini supports multimodal inputs, whereas Jamba 1.5 Large does not.

GPT-4.1 mini can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-4.1 mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Jamba 1.5 Large

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4.1 mini is licensed under a proprietary license, while Jamba 1.5 Large uses Jamba Open Model License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4.1 mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Jamba 1.5 Large

Jamba Open Model License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4.1 mini was released on 2025-04-14, while Jamba 1.5 Large was released on 2024-08-22.

GPT-4.1 mini is 8 months newer than Jamba 1.5 Large.

GPT-4.1 mini

Apr 14, 2025

1.0 years ago

7mo newer
Jamba 1.5 Large

Aug 22, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4.1 mini has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while Jamba 1.5 Large has a cutoff of 2024-03-05.

GPT-4.1 mini has more recent training data (up to 2024-05-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Jamba 1.5 Large (2024-03-05).

GPT-4.1 mini

May 2024

2 mo newer
Jamba 1.5 Large

Mar 2024

Provider Availability

GPT-4.1 mini is available from OpenAI. Jamba 1.5 Large is available from Bedrock, Google.

GPT-4.1 mini

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.60/1M

Jamba 1.5 Large

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $8.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $8.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (1,047,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GPQA score (65.0% vs 36.9%)
Higher MMLU score (87.5% vs 81.2%)
Has open weights
OpenAIGPT-4.1 mini
AI21 LabsJamba 1.5 Large

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 mini
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4.1 mini vs Jamba 1.5 Large.

Which is better, GPT-4.1 mini or Jamba 1.5 Large?

GPT-4.1 mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-4.1 mini is made by OpenAI and Jamba 1.5 Large is made by AI21 Labs. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GPT-4.1 mini compare to Jamba 1.5 Large in benchmarks?

GPT-4.1 mini scores CharXiv-D: 88.4%, MMLU: 87.5%, IFEval: 84.1%, MMMLU: 78.5%, MathVista: 73.1%. Jamba 1.5 Large scores ARC-C: 93.0%, GSM8k: 87.0%, MMLU: 81.2%, Arena Hard: 65.4%, TruthfulQA: 58.3%.

Is GPT-4.1 mini cheaper than Jamba 1.5 Large?

GPT-4.1 mini is 5.0x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-4.1 mini costs $0.40/M input and $1.60/M output via openai. Jamba 1.5 Large costs $2.00/M input and $8.00/M output via bedrock.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4.1 mini and Jamba 1.5 Large?

GPT-4.1 mini supports 1.0M tokens and Jamba 1.5 Large supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4.1 mini and Jamba 1.5 Large?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 256K), input pricing ($0.40 vs $2.00/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Jamba Open Model License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-4.1 mini and Jamba 1.5 Large?

GPT-4.1 mini is developed by OpenAI and Jamba 1.5 Large is developed by AI21 Labs.