The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-4.1 nano vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max leads the LLM Stats Score 51.9 to 1.6. GPT-4.1 nano is 14.1x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8 Max leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.9 to 1.6, ranking #11 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8 Max wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, GPT-4.1 nano is roughly 14.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-4.1 nano also accepts a larger context window (1,047,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-4.1 nano

  • cost matters — it's about 14.1x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,047,576 token context window

Choose Qwen3.8 Max

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.9 and ranks #11 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
1.6
#319
51.9
#11
2.0
#307
50.6
#11
-11.8
#265
39.6
#14
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.10 / M
$1.65 / M
Output price
$0.40 / M
$4.95 / M
Context window
1,047,576
256,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

5 shared
Index
GPT-4.1 nano
Qwen3.8 Max
5.0#274
33.8#52
-1.9#188
37.7#5
-10.4#193
31.9#8
1.9#108
30.1#4
0.9#149
39.4#1
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

24 reported for GPT-4.1 nano · 42 for Qwen3.8 Max

1 shared

GPT-4.1 nano outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8 Max is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3.8 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-4.1 nano costs less

For input processing, GPT-4.1 nano ($0.10/1M tokens) is 16.5x cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max ($1.65/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-4.1 nano ($0.40/1M tokens) is 12.4x cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max ($4.95/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3.8 Max is more expensive than GPT-4.1 nano.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Sep 12 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 nano
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerOpenAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Max
Input tokens$1.65
Output tokens$4.95
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-4.1 nano accepts 1,047,576 input tokens compared to Qwen3.8 Max's 256,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max can generate longer responses up to 256,000 tokens, while GPT-4.1 nano is limited to 32,768 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-4.1 nano
Input1,047,576 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Max
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Sat Sep 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-4.1 nano and Qwen3.8 Max support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-4.1 nano

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8 Max

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4.1 nano is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.8 Max uses Qwen3.8-Max License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4.1 nano

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8-Max License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4.1 nano was released on 2025-04-14, while Qwen3.8 Max was released on 2026-08-02.

Qwen3.8 Max is 16 months newer than GPT-4.1 nano.

GPT-4.1 nano

Apr 14, 2025

1.4 years ago

Qwen3.8 Max

Aug 2, 2026

1 months ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4.1 nano has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while Qwen3.8 Max's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4.1 nano's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.8 Max's cutoff date.

GPT-4.1 nano

May 2024

Qwen3.8 Max

Provider Availability

GPT-4.1 nano is available from OpenAI. Qwen3.8 Max is available from DeepInfra, Fireworks, Novita, Together.

GPT-4.1 nano

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M

Qwen3.8 Max

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $1.65/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.95/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.25/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-4.1 nano and Qwen3.8 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-4.1 nano
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8 Max
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4.1 nano vs Qwen3.8 Max.

Which is better, GPT-4.1 nano or Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max leads the LLM Stats Score 51.9 to 1.6. GPT-4.1 nano is made by OpenAI and Qwen3.8 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-4.1 nano compare to Qwen3.8 Max in benchmarks?

GPT-4.1 nano scores MMLU: 80.1%, IFEval: 74.5%, CharXiv-D: 73.9%, MMMLU: 66.9%, Multi-IF: 57.2%. Qwen3.8 Max scores PaperBench: 93.0%, MRCR v2 (8-needle): 92.9%, GPQA: 92.6%, VideoMME w sub.: 90.4%, RealWorldQA: 88.0%.

Is GPT-4.1 nano cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max?

GPT-4.1 nano is 16.5x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-4.1 nano costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via openai. Qwen3.8 Max costs $1.65/M input and $4.95/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4.1 nano and Qwen3.8 Max?

GPT-4.1 nano supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.8 Max supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4.1 nano and Qwen3.8 Max?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (1.6 vs 51.9), context window (1.0M vs 256K), input pricing ($0.10 vs $1.65/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Qwen3.8-Max License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-4.1 nano and Qwen3.8 Max?

GPT-4.1 nano is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3.8 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.