GPT-4o vs Qwen3.5-9B Comparison

Comparing GPT-4o and Qwen3.5-9B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

GPT-4o outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.5-9B is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen3.5-9B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerAzure
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-9B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-4o specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only GPT-4o specifies output context (4,096 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input128,000 tokens
Output4,096 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-9B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both GPT-4o and Qwen3.5-9B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-4o

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.5-9B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4o is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.5-9B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4o

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.5-9B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4o was released on 2024-05-13, while Qwen3.5-9B was released on 2026-03-02.

Qwen3.5-9B is 22 months newer than GPT-4o.

GPT-4o

May 13, 2024

1.8 years ago

Qwen3.5-9B

Mar 2, 2026

2 weeks ago

1.8yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.5-9B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (81.7% vs 53.6%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (82.5% vs 72.6%)
OpenAIGPT-4o
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3.5-9B

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-9B